State Highway entitlement
Case SI-25-0001
Approved 5-0
freeApproved 5-0moved by Mark Bloomfield11 conditions of approval
11 recorded conditions. Full condition text is available in Pro.
Boulder County access in Pro, $39/month.
Boulder County Meetings
Planning Commission, February 18, 2026
Recommends approval: Montgomery Water Tank Replacement (1041 review) at Hwy 66 & N 53rd St, 5-0
2h 23m20,140 words
34 mentionshistoric preservationpublic hearingapprovedcomprehensive planland usezoningBoulder County, CO
Just researching this meeting? Get free Boulder County alerts
What happened
On February 18, 2026, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Montgomery Water Tank Replacement (1041 review) at Hwy 66 & N 53rd St (5-0).
The Boulder County Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners conditionally approve docket SI-25-0001, the Montgomery Water Tank Replacement, a 1041 area-of-state-interest review for a new 6.4-million-gallon partially buried fi…
Meeting key facts
- Jurisdiction
- Boulder County, CO
- Governing body
- Advisory (makes a recommendation)
- Date
- February 18, 2026
- Decisions
- 1 zoning decision
- Outcome
- Recommends approval, 5-0
- Next step
- Final board vote (pending)
Free sample: decision 1 of 1
Montgomery Water Tank Replacement (1041 review) at Hwy 66 & N 53rd St
Planning Commission recommended conditional approval to the Board of County Commissioners of docket SI-25-0001, a 1041 areas and activities of state interest review for replacement of the existing Montgomery Water Tank at the northeast corner of State Highway 66 and North 53rd Street. Applicant is...
Key Decisions (1)
Approved
Montgomery Water Tank Replacement (1041 review) at Hwy 66 & N 53rd St
Vote: 5-011 conditions attachedMoved by Mark Bloomfield
Development Activity (1)
Montgomery Water Tank Replacement
Infrastructure
Market Signals (2)
Infrastructure
Longmont is investing in redundant finished-water storage (6.4M gallons) funded…
Infrastructure
Utility infrastructure is an allowed by-right use in Boulder County's…
Agenda results
Each land-use item on the agenda, with its recorded voteWho spoke
13 distinct speakers; 12 identified names.
All speaker roles: 2 Applicant Rep, 1 Applicant, 5 Commissioner, 1 Witness, 2 Staff, 1 Public, 1 Chair.
Identified name roles: 2 Applicant Rep, 1 Applicant, 5 Commissioner, 1 Witness, 2 Staff, 1 Chair.
Speaker sample: Joe Mahalski, Applicant.
11 more identified names in Pro: 2 Applicant Rep, 5 Commissioner, 1 Witness, 2 Staff, 1 Chair.
Full speaker roster in Pro
Meeting audio
Listen to the recording and select a timestamp with Pro.
Audio in Pro
Zoning terms (6)
34 recorded timestamps
- historic preservation (16 timestamps)
- public hearing (7 timestamps)
- approved (7 timestamps)
- comprehensive plan (2 timestamps)
- land use (1 timestamps)
- zoning (1 timestamps)
Decision moments (1)
Ask this meeting anything
The transcript is ready. Ask questions with answers cited to this meeting in Pro.
Meeting Q&A in Pro
Questions you can ask
- What conditions were attached to the decisions?
- What were the recorded votes?
- Who spoke, and what did they discuss?
Go deeper on this meeting
1 recorded decisions, 11 conditions across 1 decisions. Available full write-ups are included with Pro for Boulder County.
Full write-up and conditions in Pro
Follow Boulder County
Get the agenda when a meeting is posted, plus decision and analysis alerts.
We'll email you a 6-digit code, no password.
or