Deer Park Road conditional use permit
Case 26-989
Continued
freeContinuedmoved by Brooks
Napa County Meetings
Planning Commission, May 6, 2026
Decided: Presentation on Napa County 2026 Water Availability Analysis Guidance Document
2h 3m17,184 words
Just researching this meeting? Get free Napa County alerts
What happened
On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission acted on Presentation on Napa County 2026 Water Availability Analysis Guidance Document.
The Napa County Planning Commission held no substantive land-use votes; its only real business was continuing the Bremer Family Winery Use Permit Major Modification (Case P22-00086-MOD) to a date certain of July 1, 2026, and receiving a staff presentation on the draft 2026 Water…
Meeting key facts
- Jurisdiction
- Napa County, CA
- Governing body
- Advisory (makes a recommendation)
- Date
- May 6, 2026
- Decisions
- 2 zoning decisions
- Outcome
- Decided
Projects in this meeting (1)
A project bundles every related decision, across hearingsBremer Family Winery
Awaiting final voteFree sample: decision 1 of 2
Bremer Family Winery Use Permit Major Modification continuance
The Bremer Family Winery Use Permit Major Modification (an exception to the Napa County Road and Street Standards) was continued to a date certain of Wednesday, July 1, 2026. The public hearing was opened, no public comment was received, and no staff or applicant presentation was given.
The other decisions are listed below. Available full write-ups and conditions are included with Pro.
Get every Napa County meeting with full decisions, votes, and zoning details, within hours of each session.
Napa County access in Pro, $39/month.
Key Decisions (2)
Continued
Bremer Family Winery Use Permit Major Modification continuance
Vote: unanimousMoved by Brooks
Other
Presentation on Napa County 2026 Water Availability Analysis Guidance Document
Full write-ups and conditions for all 2 decisions in Pro.
Market Signals (4)
Infrastructure
Napa County is tightening groundwater extraction criteria (0.5 acre-feet/acre on…
Commercial Demand
Winery projects remain the dominant discretionary land-use activity before the…
Sentiment
Wine industry stakeholders are pushing back on the proposed 0.5…
Infrastructure
Hillside parcels outside the Napa Valley Subbasin face limited, hard-to-replenish…
Agenda results
Each land-use item on the agenda, with its recorded voteWho spoke
12 distinct speakers; 7 identified names.
All speaker roles: 1 Witness, 4 Public, 1 Clerk, 1 Chair, 1 Attorney, 2 Staff, 2 Commissioner.
Identified name roles: 1 Witness, 1 Chair, 1 Attorney, 2 Staff, 2 Commissioner.
Speaker sample: Parker, Staff.
6 more identified names in Pro: 1 Witness, 1 Chair, 1 Attorney, 1 Staff, 2 Commissioner.
Full speaker roster in Pro
Meeting audio
Listen to the recording and select a timestamp with Pro.
Audio in Pro
Zoning terms (8)
31 recorded timestamps
- approved (8 timestamps)
- public hearing (4 timestamps)
- land use (7 timestamps)
- residential (6 timestamps)
- adu (1 timestamps)
- commercial (2 timestamps)
Decision moments (2)
Ask this meeting anything
The transcript is ready. Ask questions with answers cited to this meeting in Pro.
Meeting Q&A in Pro
Questions you can ask
- What were the recorded votes?
- Who spoke, and what did they discuss?
Go deeper on this meeting
2 recorded decisions. Available full write-ups are included with Pro for Napa County.
Full write-up and conditions in Pro
Follow Napa County
Get the agenda when a meeting is posted, plus decision and analysis alerts.
We'll email you a 6-digit code, no password.
or