Skip to content
San Francisco Meetings

Board of Appeals - 2026-01-14

3h 51m31,248 words
68zoningvariancedeniedmotion to approveapprovedresidentialmotion to denyconditional usedensityenvironmental reviewSan Francisco, CA

Meeting Intelligence Preview

5
Decisions
2
Market Signals

Meeting Summary

The San Francisco Board of Appeals held its January 14, 2026 meeting, welcoming new commissioner Robin Abad Okubillo. The board granted an appeal to overturn the zoning administrator's denial of a rear yard variance at 3929 17th Street for construction of a rear exterior stair. A fence height appeal at 562 40th Avenue was denied as code compliant. The board also denied an appeal regarding an unauthorized dwelling unit determination at 807 44th Avenue, and continued two related permit appeals for 1077 Fell Street to February 11 pending clarification from DBI on permit status. The board took under advisement proposed legislation (File 251211) that would eliminate public appeals for city-initiated tree removals.

Key Decisions (5)

Approved

Rear Yard Variance at 3929 17th Street

Board granted appeal overturning zoning administrator's denial of variance for rear exterior stair connecting 2nd floor roof deck to rear yard. Permit holder John Gilligan received variance approval with findings drafted by appellant, planning department, and executive director emphasizing safety benefits.

Vote: 3-0Conditions: Findings limited in scope and framed on basis of safety benefits as primary motivator to curb potential negative precedent
Denied

Fence Height Appeal at 562 40th Avenue

Lee Hydeuse appealed permit issued to Sierra Peron for 10-foot fence extension along property line. Board found fence code compliant under planning code section 136 allowing fences up to 10 feet in rear yard. Appellant's concerns about light blockage and access were not supported.

Vote: 3-0
Denied

Letter of Determination Appeal at 807 44th Avenue

Ling Law appealed zoning administrator's determination that unauthorized dwelling unit was rented for consideration within last 10 years, disqualifying it from CUA exemption under planning code section 317(c)(10). Unit was occupied by IHSS caregiver. Board upheld determination finding no error or abuse of discretion.

Vote: 3-0
Deferred

Permit Appeals at 1077 Fell Street

Two related appeals (25-049 and 25-050) by Sumya Sastry regarding recommencement permits for alteration work. Board continued matter due to confusion over permit status, expiration dates, and whether recommencement was necessary given tolling during prior appeal proceedings.

Vote: 3-0Conditions: DBI to provide factual chart of permits with dates, expiration timelines, and status; parties may respond; to be reviewed by executive director before submission
Other

Tree Removal Appeals Legislation Review

Board discussed proposed legislation File 251211 that would eliminate appeals to Board of Appeals for tree removals by city departments. After extensive public comment opposing the legislation, board took matter under advisement for further discussion with agencies and supervisors.

Market Signals (2)

Sentiment

Strong public opposition to proposed legislation eliminating tree removal appeals, with over 800 petition signatures and 280 pages of public comments submitted, indicating community prioritization of environmental oversight and public participation rights.

Housing Demand

City policy continues to prioritize housing preservation through unauthorized dwelling unit regulations, requiring conditional use authorization for removal of units that were rented for consideration within 10 years.