Skip to content
San Francisco Meetings

Planning Commission, March 19, 2026

Recommends approval: SB 79 Transit Oriented Residential Development planning code amendment, 4-2

2h 42m23,225 words
114 mentionshistoric preservationland useapprovedcommercialresidentialdensityzoningindustrialmixed usevariancerezoningenvironmental reviewsetbackmotion to approvepublic hearingSan Francisco, CA
Just researching this meeting? Get free San Francisco alerts

How this board votes

The Planning Commission approved 86% of 59 recorded land-use decisions this period. Most frequent dissent: Gilbert Williams (10 of 65 recorded votes).

Parsed from the official meeting recordings. Verify against the official minutes.

See the full board record, member by member

What happened

On March 19, 2026, the Planning Commission recommended approval of SB 79 Transit Oriented Residential Development planning code amendment (4-2).

The San Francisco Planning Commission recommended approval (4-2) of the Transit Oriented Residential Development ordinance implementing SB 79 (case 2026-001412, board file 260132), adopting an alternative citywide plan that permanently excludes three industrial employment hubs an…

Meeting key facts
Jurisdiction
San Francisco, CA
Governing body
Advisory (makes a recommendation)
Date
March 19, 2026
Decisions
6 zoning decisions
Outcome
Recommends approval, 4-2
Next step
Final board vote (pending)

Projects in this meeting (1)

Above-Grade Parking Setback

Recommended
1 condition of approval
Open this project

Free sample: decision 1 of 6

Continuance of DR at 77 Broad Street

Discretionary review at 77 Broad Street (case 2023-9469) continued to 04/16/2026.

The other decisions are listed below. Available full write-ups and conditions are included with Pro.

Get every San Francisco meeting with full decisions, votes, and zoning details, within hours of each session.

San Francisco access in Pro, $39/month.

Key Decisions (6)

Continued

Continuance of DR at 77 Broad Street

Vote: 6-0
Approved

SB 79 Transit Oriented Residential Development planning code amendment

Vote: 4-21 conditions attached
Approved

1 Oak zoning map amendment and downtown project authorization at 1500-1540 Market Street

Vote: 5-11 conditions attached
Approved

Variance for above-grade parking setback at 1 Oak

1 conditions attached
Approved

Discretionary review of rear addition at 2620 20th Street

Vote: 6-0Moved by Catherine Moore
Approved

Discretionary review of firewall at light-well deck at 2460 Francisco Street

Vote: 6-01 conditions attached

4 recorded roll calls, member by member, in Pro.

Full write-ups and conditions for all 6 decisions in Pro.

Development Activity (3)

1 Oak

Residential

Rear addition at 2620 20th Street

Residential

Firewall at light-well deck, 2460 Francisco Street

Residential

Market Signals (5)

Housing Demand

San Francisco is significantly behind on market-rate RHNA housing goals…

Commercial Demand

Ground-floor retail is being removed from projects like 1 Oak…

Sentiment

Developers cite thin financial margins on residential projects; the city…

2 additional market signals with full detail in Pro.

Agenda results

7a rezone

Approved 5-1
freeApproved 5-11 condition of approval

1 recorded conditions. Full condition text is available in Pro.

Full write-up and conditions in Pro

6 plan amendment

No vote recorded

Who spoke

32 distinct speakers; 14 identified names.

All speaker roles: 1 Clerk, 5 Commissioner, 11 Public, 1 Chair, 8 Staff, 3 Applicant Rep, 1 Attorney, 2 Applicant.

Identified name roles: 1 Clerk, 1 Chair, 1 Commissioner, 6 Staff, 3 Applicant Rep, 1 Attorney, 1 Applicant.

Speaker sample: Judy Kimball, Applicant.

13 more identified names in Pro: 1 Clerk, 1 Chair, 1 Commissioner, 6 Staff, 3 Applicant Rep, 1 Attorney.

Full speaker roster in Pro

Meeting audio

Listen to the recording and select a timestamp with Pro.

Audio in Pro

Zoning terms (15)

114 recorded timestamps

  • historic preservation (2 timestamps)
  • land use (1 timestamps)
  • approved (13 timestamps)
  • commercial (3 timestamps)
  • residential (17 timestamps)
  • density (21 timestamps)

Decision moments (6)

Ask this meeting anything

The transcript is ready. Ask questions with answers cited to this meeting in Pro.

Meeting Q&A in Pro

Questions you can ask

  • What conditions were attached to the decisions?
  • What were the recorded votes?
  • Who spoke, and what did they discuss?

Go deeper on this meeting

6 recorded decisions, 4 conditions across 4 decisions. Available full write-ups are included with Pro for San Francisco.

Full write-up and conditions in Pro

Follow San Francisco

Get the agenda when a meeting is posted, plus decision and analysis alerts.

We'll email you a 6-digit code, no password.

or